The
Unique Contribution and Project Discovery were enjoyable and
interesting films to watch. They reinforced that there is value in
educational films and that when properly made and prepared the use of
films can be of great value to learning. I have felt at times that many
people view films as a way to take up time and to give the teacher a
break. The most authentic learning happens through direct experiences,
but at times with the limitation of the classroom, geography and group
size make providing these experiences impossible. What a teacher must
be careful of is to find and use films or movies that are appropriate
for the students and the learning objectives. Another important
component in using films is to teach students how to get the most out of
films and to teach them that it is not a break and a time to turn off.
It is very easy in the present times to search and find material that
is relevant but of low quality. The story of the the student who
fainted during the anti-bullying video is a perfect example of how the
quick access to material can cause misunderstanding and potential
problems. This also relates to the fact that if a teacher does not take
the time to preview and introduce material no matter how high quality
the film is the message will be lost for many. Film Tactics has
reinforced that lesson.
What
also struck me about The Unique Contribution and Project Discovery was
that if you replaced the word film with iPad and some of the other
technical term such as photomicography with app, animation with virtual
reality these films could have been used by the St. James School
Division to promote their new iPad program that was in the news. I hope
that St. James has thought as thoroughly about the iPad program as it
appear Encyclopedia Britanica had thought about the positive ways for
film to impact student learning.
Looking back at old films and the introduction to media archeology has shown that looking back at where we have come from in relation to technology is a valuable practice. For some reason studying the history of technology seems counterintuitive to some, but looking back at the history of communities and cultures is a very normal and accepted practice. Maybe if we were taught to look back more at technology and see that there have been many great ideas over the years and that many of the ideas and next greatest things are just new versions of the something from the past, some of the novelty and hype that often surrounds the next new technology could be dispelled and people could be more critical consumers of technology.
I have also found the media archeology aspect of our course very interesting. As you say, revisiting old technology in light of new technology highlights that the new is really an updated version of the old. It's not like the idea has just come into being but has been revamped. We often see this with the movies, where a movie made years ago is re-made and updated to reflect today's society. The theme is not new...it just has a new look.
ReplyDeleteI have to echo both of your sentiments regarding the value of media archeology. Who would have thought that to better understand our relationship to the most recent technological innovation, we need to take a historical journey?
ReplyDeleteI agree that it is important to not view films as a break or time to tune out. I went to a infant feeding class this week and 2 videos were shown during the class. We were not given an overview of what the videos were going to be about, or what we should be watching for. The instructor for the class left the room during the videos (obviously seeing that time as her break). Before taking this class, I really would not have thought much about this, however know I realize that I could have gotten so much more out of the film if the instructor had used them more effectively.
ReplyDelete